|
|
Post by denney on Jul 26, 2006 23:45:22 GMT -5
I seen that post Just a warning to you all - if you post at the 1886 Mdewakanton board - BE CAREFUL!!! Mr. unknown author abuses his administrative status to modify other people's posts. I know this for a fact as I posted an email I received from Mr. Gary Montana in response to a very slanderous post made by Mr. Leith about him - Carl modified it to appear that Mr. Montana was posting under my screen name of Fancy1. I changed it back as I had copied it to my jump drive but I wouldn't doubt it if he modified it again. He also modified another post of mine to make it look like I had said something I didn't - I mean how stupid is he - it said at the bottom of MY post, "last modified at 10:14 pm by Carl Leith" !! Just thought I would pass this information on to you. If you dare say anything he doesn't like he can just modify your post so BE CAREFUL especially if you post something he doesn't like or agree with. Fancy1 |
|
|
|
Post by denney on Jul 26, 2006 23:55:52 GMT -5
No not really if he didnt like the way you put something he needed to remove it or contact you to change it or remove it. It isn`t right and can lead to bad information. And we need not have that.. Is that legal to do such a thing - modifiy what others post? |
|
|
|
Post by tamara on Jul 27, 2006 0:25:57 GMT -5
I think CL name is set to not post here in order to keep this board clean.... I meant decent... or neutral.. yes, thats it, neutral.. LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by tamara on Jul 27, 2006 0:47:59 GMT -5
I read all that as well.... pretty bad and cant believe what was cited by Kaardal as a means to inform the public has deteriorated to that level. I think the Crackhead thing was uncalled for, stick to the issues.
Is it just me or is this too out of hand? This is the type of thing that made my aunt feel as though she didnt want to be a part this. I, however know, that it is reflective of only a few and certainly not Mr Kaardal or many others. Fancy, I dont think you had a choice but to respond to that and set the facts straight, who knows what some would have thought had you not.
|
|
|
|
Post by peacekeeper on Jul 27, 2006 7:44:34 GMT -5
Just a thought, cause I don't really know for sure. Under Freeweb's (or whoever sponsors that site) is slander one of the things the people are not allowed to do and is is listed in the policy?
Jackie
|
|
|
|
Post by kjames on Jul 27, 2006 10:43:55 GMT -5
I don't post often, but I just want to put my 2 cents in... I frequent both boards daily...and both are very informative I wouldn't know much of anything about the case without either of them It's my opinion that if you don't like what some are saying don't read it...don't get bullied into an arguement...just walk away Take in all the useful information and ignore the rest. I am sure most people know what the opinions are of frequent posters on both sides...so simply accept that we all are blessed with different perspectives and move on... I for one am tired of seeing people bash each other LD vs. non-LD, this board vs. the other, this lawyer vs. that lawyer No one is better than the other. So let's get back to business and help each other rediscover history.  |
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jul 27, 2006 11:13:00 GMT -5
Under this category you can read to see if he has violated any of the forum terms of use...
Announcement: RULES!! Here you will find this to see if you would like to complain about that board. I would have to think that he could delete what ever unless you have placed a copy right on the post...further more you would need his permission to enter that post on the board before hand. As for the altering the post, by using his name in place of others that is a violation that PB would have to investigate. People it is about being professional...isn't it?
Fancy1 if you feel that you have been violated? I will send you a report link. You will summon the WOLF!!
|
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jul 27, 2006 11:30:46 GMT -5
Why would you want to fallow or adhere to MILLIONS IN WEEKS!!? MILLIONS IN MONTHS? Do people DIG that kind of let down? The case is in steps not mass consumption to retain it NOW. LET YOUR LAWYERS DO THE TALKING. I don't have time for pip sweaks like him. Denney where and how would you like to edit your post...HINT!!!
The defence rest your honor. Oyate exchange is not involved with the other forum.
|
|
|
|
Post by tamara on Jul 27, 2006 14:24:34 GMT -5
KJames, well said.
|
|
|
|
Post by peacekeeper on Jul 27, 2006 15:17:16 GMT -5
KJ James I agree with what you said. The one thing you let out though is a thing called the "Human Factor". I, like most people, have a hard time walking away when something really upsets us. But we all know that we need to try to overlook the slights, innuendos, etc. and stay together as a family. There have been cases of negativity on both sites and Fancy I understand why you were upset. What we need to remember is we can't change other people's perceptions or thoughts, but we can control our own. Thank you everyone on our website for continuing to work together and help each other. Last - Remember that by commenting and building on comments we do not agree with, we ultimately spread that fire. So let it cease to exist and move to more productive things.
Thanks for listening.
Jackie
|
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jul 27, 2006 15:34:36 GMT -5
Many have stated they like this forum...THAT says it ALL. Has the jury reached  a verdict? |
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jul 27, 2006 16:00:42 GMT -5
Chess is on!!
|
|
|
|
Post by hyland on Jul 28, 2006 8:33:08 GMT -5
fancy1, if you do not like what is said on the other forum, why would you even go there? That goes for everyone else. It seems that some feed off of what is said there and then comes back here and posts. Which then starts negativity here. It's almost like being a tattle tale. ex: Mommy joey hit me.  Please lets keep this forum they way it is suppose to be. Helping others find their roots and informing others of information on the law suite. Thanks, hyland |
|
|
|
Post by tamara on Jul 28, 2006 9:34:23 GMT -5
I think it is an exception to your very sound and wise advice to respond to a remark that could discourage and cause distrust amongst those that have asked for Mr Montana to represent them. To state that their attorney is a drug user is a bit more than the reqular smack talk and requires addressing and I think she did that and is done. She and others might be more personally aquainted with Mr Monatan and have a harder time letting such a remark pass. Many people read that board and know that it can be a good source of information. Although one may see a different perspective much can be learned by hearing anothers angle. If you read further back than the current strain of smack talk and small talk, you can see why people value CLeith, and no one can accuse him of not putting his all into what he believes in. I can imagine that when he looks back in the future he will be able to see how calling an intervening attorney a "crackhead" and embarrassment, doesnt fit with the character he had been showing prior to the recent line of talk. Actually such is the nature of a mesage board, to agree and disagree.
|
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jul 28, 2006 10:59:22 GMT -5
I don't know any of the people that are on the other board...but yet I WAS JUDGED! That is wrong. hyland YOU ARE RIGHT! Everyone...we all know that the admin over at the other board is full of crud...further more if you DIG what he says keep it to your self. WE OVER HERE KNOW PRETTY MUCH WHAT THEY KNOW. BOTTOM LINE IS "RESEARCH."
If you are LD that is good...I for one am not one yet. Why? personal I guess?? lol
Go Montana...don't mind carl he did not take his "social meds."
"ATTORNEYS RULE!"
|
|
|
|
Post by peacekeeper on Jul 28, 2006 13:23:28 GMT -5
Back to work people!! We have individuals and families that need our help. I for one, find helping others much more productive. I know I can make a difference.
Jackie
|
|
|
|
Post by tamara on Jul 28, 2006 13:37:31 GMT -5
Yes, Yes, very good point Jamie, wise for such a youngster (everyone else seems so young to me today) lol
We do know as much as they do by way of the lawsuit and probably dont need to check there anymore. It hadnt occurred to me to see it from that perspective. I also think it isnt that we had joined there for conflict and it wasnt always divided as it is now. I view this site as more of a research site and we know that we work with more history than just relating to the lawsuit so lets widen the perspective in research and look at some other things or areas. I am going to see what I have to share.
Tamara
|
|
|
|
Post by redbrother on Jul 28, 2006 21:51:37 GMT -5
fancy1, if you do not like what is said on the other forum, why would you even go there? That goes for everyone else. It seems that some feed off of what is said there and then comes back here and posts. Which then starts negativity here. It's almost like being a tattle tale. ex: Mommy joey hit me. Please lets keep this forum they way it is suppose to be. Helping others find their roots and informing others of information on the law suite. Thanks, hyland I think the best way to combat that is to just ignore the negativity. I think it brings a kind of 'shame' to whoever does it, when they realize it. No combatant or punishment required. We are all only human, but just see what it is they are saying, maybe let them steam a little and try to ignore it if it's real negative or offensive, or change the subject. That to me is the best way to let people talk and keep it cool. Not that anyone here has really lost there heads, not that I have seen since I've been here. Hell' I never even went to the other board and I don't care to. Good day all. |
|
|
|
Post by tamara on Jul 28, 2006 22:47:54 GMT -5
I don't know any of the people that are on the other board...but yet I WAS JUDGED! That is wrong. hyland YOU ARE RIGHT! Everyone...we all know that the admin over at the other board is full of crud...further more if you DIG what he says keep it to your self. WE OVER HERE KNOW PRETTY MUCH WHAT THEY KNOW. BOTTOME LINE IS "RESEARCH." If you are LD that is good...I for one am not one yet. Why? personal I guess?? lol Go Montana...don't mind carl he did not take his "social meds." "ATTOURNEYS RULE!" What would be a great link to get info from the court without having to read crud, beside MKlaw? |
|
|
|
Post by peacekeeper on Jul 29, 2006 6:45:03 GMT -5
www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/2006.htmThis is where I have found everyting else on our suit. I just checked it last night, and nothing has been published yet. Jackie
|
|
a verdict?
