|
Post by hermin1 on May 31, 2012 11:17:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jun 28, 2012 22:29:24 GMT -5
good or bad...?
|
|
|
Post by hermin1 on Jun 29, 2012 9:52:01 GMT -5
jamie: all the jerks did was reiterate the history leading up to the Judge's ruling.i researched those changes re. congressional action in re to what reports etc. need to be filed, and etc. The govt. attorneys missed the boat. Judge lettow has Plenary powers as set forth by law,so he can do what he did re. ordering the Sec. of Interior to submit that list and schedule of disbursement.
|
|
|
Post by tanman on Jun 30, 2012 9:23:12 GMT -5
I could never understand how the 1863 legislation authorizing land grants to the loyal Dakota could co-exist with the Removal Act of the same year. How could one grant acres of land to the loyal Mdewakanton in those Minnesota counties if Indians weren't even allowed to remain in Minnesota? Did anybody in Wolfchild ever address this?
I'm not sure why you call the attorneys for the US "jerks", though. Why are they jerks if they are only doing their job? Suing someone makes them a defendant and their counsel is obliged to put up the best fight, the best defense they can. What else would you expect?
Update: Found a copy of the 1863 Removal Act and saw that it excepted the loyal Dakota from being transported.
|
|